Allowed

G.Ramaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC27 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/7124/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest for offences under Section 379 IPC and Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957, subject to posting bond and sureties and appearing for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; accused released on bail upon appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi, executing a bond for Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

G.Ramaraj Vs the Inspector of Police — Mining and Natural Resources | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.7124 of 2018

¶7

G.RAMARAJ ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Rank Not Known

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE LALGUDI POLICE STATION TRICHY DISTRICT CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.SIVABALAN Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 379 of I.P.C., and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals(Development and Regulations) Act, 1957, in Crime No.201 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and that he has not committed any such offence alleged by the respondent and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

¶16

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that till date no First Information Report has been registered, but there is a basis for apprehension. He further submitted that there is no previous case registered against the petitioner.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi, and executing a bond for a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate

¶18

¶19

concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶20

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate

¶21

within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/-

27/04/2018

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, LALGUDI, TRICHY DISTRICT

¶28

2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT

¶29

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE LALGUDI POLICE STATION TRICHY DISTRICT

¶30

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶31

+1. CC to M/S.K.SIVABALAN Advocate SR.No.7515

¶32

PMU

¶33

JAM/07/05/2018/ CM /GSR 2P-6C

¶34

ORDER

¶35

¶36

CRL OP(MD) No.7124 of 2018 Date :27/04/2018

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Ramaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Ramaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Ramkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Ayyakannu Vs the Inspector of Police

Thangamari Vs the Insepctor of Police

Saravanan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Murugan, Vs the Commissioner of Police

Stephen Vs the Superintendent of Police