Pethammal, v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed as the petitioner withdrew the petition with the court's permission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Fourteenth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN
CRL OP(MD) No.7149 of 2018
Vs
STATE,
REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI.
(CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioners : M/S.S.PRABHA Advocate
For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the above, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/-
14/06/2018
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
2
TO
PETHAMMAL
STATE
G.R.SWAMINATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court