Dismissed

Tmt. M. Vijayalakshmi v. Mr. B. Mohan

Madras HC2 Apr 2018CRL MP(MD)/2142/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an petitions challenging anticipatory bail, the court dismissed the plea to cancel bail granted to the first respondent. Instead, it directed the magistrate to expedite the trial within three months. A non-bailable warrant was also addressed pending enforcement issues.

What did the court decide?

The petition to cancel anticipatory bail was dismissed; the Magistrate was directed to conclude the trial on or before 30.06.2018.

Tmt. M. Vijayalakshmi Vs Mr. B. Mohan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Second day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.2142 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.2065 of 2014

¶6

M. VIJAYALAKSHMI ... PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

1 B. MOHAN

THE STATE REP.BY,

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶11

(CRIME NO.5 OF 2014)

¶12

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to cancel the Anticipatory Bail to the 1st respondent granted by this Honourable Court in Crl.OP(MDNO. 2065 of 2014 dated 12.02.2014

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.V.OM PRAKASH, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Government Advocate (Crl.side) for R2 & R3 the court made the following order:-

¶15

The petitioner is the defacto complainant. Her husband is the accused. This Court granted Anticipatory Bail in his favour on 12.02.2014. Thereafter, the case was charge sheeted. It was taken on file. Three witnesses has also been examined.

¶16

2.The primary grievance of the petitioner/defacto complainant is that the first respondent is absconding and thus delaying the trial proceedings. Therefore, the petitioner herein wants this Court to cancel the Anticipatory Bail already granted in favour of the first respondent.

¶17

3.This Court is of the view that relief can be given to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner by directing the jurisdictional Magistrate to enforce the Non Bailable Warrant issued against the first respondent.

¶18

4.At this stage, the learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) submits that as of now no Non Bailable Warrant is pending against the first respondent.

¶19

5.The learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai is directed to expedite the trial in C.C.No.237 of 2014 and conclude the same on or before 30.06.2018.

¶20

6.With this direction, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

¶21

sd/02/04/2018

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. C.C. to M/S.V.OM PRAKASH Advocate SR.No.59410 ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.2142 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.2065 of 2014 Date :02/04/2018

¶25

MKV-CM-VR-SAR 4/9.4.2018/2P-7C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tmt. M. Vijayalakshmi v. Mr. B. Mohan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tmt. M. Vijayalakshmi v. Mr. B. Mohan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Raghavalu Vs Additional General

M/S.Mmr Gardens Vs the Commissioner of Income

V.Subramanian,S/O.R.Velayutham Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Nagavalli, W/O.Ganesan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Kasi Manavalan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Baskar, Vs the Inspector of Police