The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC and connected miscellaneous petitions as they had become infructuous, thereby closing the proceedings without substantive adjudication on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.04.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.21397 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2013
Parvathi ...Petitioner/Accused/Protection Officer
Vs
1.V.Shyam Sundar ...Respondent/Petitioner/3rd Party 2.N.Jeganathan 3.Leelavathi 4.Nalini ...Respondents/3rd Party/Respondents 5.Hemalatha ...Respondents/Complainant
Prayer: This petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to call for the entire records connected with Cr.M.P.No.2510 of 2013 in Cr.M.P.No.1531 of 2012, pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai and quash the complaint in the said Cr.M.P.No.2510 of 2013 alone as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Therefore, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.21397 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2013
PK/RR/SAR-1/04.06.2018 : 2P/3C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parvathi
V. Shyam Sundar
N. Jeganathan
Leelavathi
Nalini
Hemalatha
G.R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
