Disposed

Mohaideen Beevi v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC30 Oct 2018CRL OP(MD)/19338/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a criminal original petition seeking quashing of proceedings. The court directed the respondent police to file the final report with the court within 10 days, allowing the petitioner to challenge it thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent police to file the final report before the court below within 10 days from receipt of the order copy.

Mohaideen Beevi Vs the Inspector of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.10.2018 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH CRL.O.P.(MD)No.19338 of 2018 and CRL.M.P.(MD)No.8731 of 2018

¶3

1.Mohaideen Beevi

¶4

2.Mahaboobani

¶5

3.Fathima Beevi .. Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3

¶6

-Vs-

¶7

1.State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Pettai Police Station, Tirunelveli City. (Crime No.158 of 2018) .. 1^st Respondent/Complainant

¶8

2.Saraswathi .. 2^nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Crime No.158 of 2018 on the file of the 1^st respondent police and quash the same.

¶9

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Pon Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi for R1 Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶10

ORDER

¶11

This Criminal original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No. 158/2018 pending on the file of the first respondent police.

¶12

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the respondent police have completed the investigation and have also filed the final report before the Judicial Magistrate No.V, Tirunelveli and the same is yet to be taken on file.

¶13

3.The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent police to number the final report before the Court below within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is left open to the petitioner to challenge the final report if so advised. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶14

Sd/-

¶15

Assistant Registrar(WRITS)

¶16

/True Copy/

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)

¶19

¶20

TM To

¶21

1.The Inspector of Police, Pettai Police Station, Tirunelveli City.

¶22

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶23

1 CC TO Mr.R.Pon Karthikeyan, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 93163.

¶24

¶25

DS SKN SAR4 20 12 2018 2P 4C

¶26

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.19338 of 2018

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mohaideen Beevi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohaideen Beevi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Aswin Rajasimman Vs the Inspector of Police

Aathimuthu Manoharan, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Jeyakumar Vs Senthilkumar

M. Raveendran Vs the Inspector of Police

V.Sam Rabinson, Vs C.Kolappa Pillai

R.Harisindhuja Vs R. Hema