Allowed

T.Aswin Rajasimman v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC29 Oct 2018CRL OP(MD)/10702/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed an original petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of an FIR. Court ordered the quashing of the FIR pending before the second respondent and allowed the petition by referring to a previous batch judgment covering the same facts.

What did the court decide?

FIR in Crime No.01/2017 quashed; Criminal Original Petition allowed; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

T.Aswin Rajasimman Vs the Inspector of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 29.10.2018

¶4

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.10702 of 2017 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.7339 of 2017

¶6

T.Aswin Rajasimman : Petitioner/Accused No.4 Vs.

¶7

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District. (Crime No.2 of 2017)

¶8

The Inspector of Police, CBCID – OCU, OCU, Madurai City, (Crime No.1 of 2017) ...Respondents 1&2/Complainants 3. S.Indira Gandhi ...3^rd Respondent/Defacto Complainant

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.02 of 2017 dated 18.01.2017 on the file of the respondent No.1 which is transferred as Crime No.01/2017 dated 05.02.2017 on the file of the respondent No.2 and quash the same as illegal as against this petitioner.

¶10

For R3 : Ms.Indira Gandhi **O R D E R **************

¶11

This petition is filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.02 of 2017, dated 18.01.2017 on the file of the first respondent, which is transferred as Crime No.01/2017 dated 05.02.2017 on the file of the second respondent.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.The facts of this case is covered by the Judgment of this Court made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1356 of 2018 batch, dated 20.09.2018. Accordingly, Crime No.01 of 2017 dated 05.02.2017 pending before the

¶13

¶14

second respondent, is hereby quashed and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar(RECORDS)

¶17

/True Copy/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶19

¶20

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District. (Crime No.2 of 2017)

¶21

The Inspector of Police, CBCID – OCU, OCU, Madurai City,

¶22

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶23

+1cc to Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy ,Advocate Sr.No.93183

¶24

¶25

KM-VB/SV/SAR2/10.12.2018/2P/5C

¶26

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.10702 of 2017

¶27

29.10.2018

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Aswin Rajasimman v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Aswin Rajasimman v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Sriraman Vs State Rep.by

G. Malaichamy Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

Mohamed Atham Vs the Inspector of Police

Aathimuthu Manoharan, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Jeyakumar Vs Senthilkumar

Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police