“ The accused himself clearly and categorically admitted in 3rd paragraph of this petition in CrMP No.106 of 2016 that “ the counter to CrMP No.37 of 2015 is confined only to those documents referred in the petition in CrMP No.37 of 2015.”. So, the accused while filing counter confined with regard to documents referred in the petition CrMP NO.37 of 2015. In the above said petition, above said order four documents were proposed to be marked. PW.43(LW49) Annadurai deposed with regard to the Mos.16 and 17, which are the blood stained Khaki Uniform. In the above said uniform a portion was pealed off which is mentioned in S.No.2, in the list of properties, which is marked as MO.18. The remaining uniform attached materials namely, star, name board rope with cutting position and banyan with cut of shape. The above said items were separately marked as MO.15 and used bullets and unused bullets were marked as MO.24 and MO.25 which is mentioned in the list of properties as Item No.1. So, all the Mos marked through the PW43 (LW49) by way of recalling him are all only permitted properties as per order in CrmP(MD)No.37 of 2015. The above said items sought to be marked by way of separate petition and after hearing both sides speaking order was passed and sufficient was given to the accused. Since he sought for preferring revision. Only after ascertaining from the counsel for the accused that Cr.R.P was dismissed and then the prosecution was permitted to further examine the PW43 (LW49). While marking the material objects, the accused has not raised any objection. Further more, the PW43 was examined https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ during the Advocate boycott period. Hence, after the appearance of the Counsel, the petitioner now came
