Disposed

S. Nagarathinam v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC16 Aug 2018CRL OP(MD)/1071/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a criminal original petition seeking to stop police harassment. The court directed the petitioner to cooperate while prohibiting the police from summoning the petitioner for regular enquiry without registering an FIR, citing Supreme Court guidelines.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to cooperate with police for enquiry without harassment, provided no valid complaint exists and no FIR is registered yet.

S. Nagarathinam Vs the Superintendent of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.08.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1071 of 2018

S.Nagarathinam

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Subramaniapuram, Trichy.

¶9

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Lalgudi, Trichy.

¶10

3.The Inspector of Police, Lalgudi Police Station, Trichy District.

¶11

4.A.Peer Mohamed ...Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., to direct the 3^rd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry without any valid complaint.

¶13

For Petitioner :Mr.G.Balumahendran

¶14

For R1 to R3 :Mr.M.Chandra Sekaran Additional Public Prosecutor

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

¶17

2.Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

¶18

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submits that on the complaint given by the fourth respondent against the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending on the file of the respondent police

¶19

4.The petitioner is directed to cooperate with the police for enquiry and at the time of conducting of the enquiry, the petitioner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ shall not be harassed by the police. The police cannot call the petitioner on a regular basis in the guise of enquiry without even registering an FIR and Supreme Court of India in Lalitha Kumari Vs.

¶20

¶21

Government of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2013 (6) CTC 353 has enumerated the nature of cases where preliminary enquiry can be conducted and has also restricted the period, for which preliminary enquiry can be conducted. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, third respondent is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against the respondent proceeding to take action in accordance with law.

¶22

5.With the above directions, the Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(P&A)

¶25

/True Copy/

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶27

¶28