Disposed

C.Ravindran v. Deputy Commissioner of Police

Madras HC23 Nov 2018CRL OP/27213/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought police protection from harassment by opposing side's advocates in a pending property suit. High Court directed police to investigate the harassment and instruct advocates to refrain from intervening; further intervention warrants action under law.

What did the court decide?

Direction to 3rd respondent to call concerned parties for enquiry and instruct advocates not to intervene; if intervention continues, take action per law.

C.Ravindran Vs Deputy Commissioner of Police — Property and Title | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 23.11.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.27213 of 2018

¶6

C.Ravindran .. Petitioner

¶7

¶8

Deputy Commissioner of Police, Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Adyar Range, First Floor, J Police Station, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020.

¶9

Asst. Commissioner of Police, Office of the Asst. Commissioner of Police, First Floor, Police Station, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

¶10

Inspector of Police R6 Kumaran Nagar Police Station, Jafferkhanpet, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 056. .. Respondents

¶11

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondent to grant police protection to the ground floor shop portion bearing door No.10 Jawaharlal Nehru Salai, (Anjugam Nagar Main Road) Jafferkhanpet, Ashok Nagar, Chennai – 86 measuring an extent of 750 sq.ft.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.C.B.Muralikrishnan

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Addl.Public Prosecutor

¶14

O R D E R This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondent police to grant police protection to the petitioner.

¶15

It is seen from records that earlier the petitioner was a tenant under one Indrani Ammal and he is in possession and enjoyment of the property from 1990 onwards. The owner of the property, viz., Indrani Ammal, in the year 2005, executed a settlement deed in favour of one Nehru. The petitioner

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

continued to be a tenant under the said Nehru. Thereafter, there was inter se dispute between the said Indrani Ammal and Nehru, which resulted in filing of the suit in O.S.No.1317 of 2014 and that suit filed by the Indrani Ammal was dismissed.

¶18

Thereafter, the other legal heirs attempted to interfere with the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner has filed a suit in O.S.No.2498 of 2017 and the same is pending before the 6^th Assistant, City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the other side in order to put pressure on the petitioner, started engaging advocates who started coming to the shop in occupation of the petitioner and caused threat to the petitioner. The petitioner has given a complaint before the 3^rd respondent seeking for police protection and the 3^rd respondent has also issued a C.S.R. Number on 23.07.2018. According the learned counsel for the petitioner, the threat by the advocates engaged by the other side continues and the respondent police are not taking any action. Therefore, this petition has been filed seeking for police protection.

¶20

In the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be a direction to the 3^rd respondent to call the concerned parties for an enquiry and if the 3^rd respondent finds that the advocates are intervening in the pending dispute between the parties, appropriate instructions may be given to them, not to intervene and allow the parties to agitate their rights before the Court below, where the suit is pending. If in spite of the same, if there is intervention by persons calling themselves as advocates, the 3^rd respondent shall take action in accordance with law.

¶21

This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

¶22

ssr/kal

¶23

¶24

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Adyar Range, First Floor,

¶25

J Police Station, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Office of the Asst. Commissioner of Police, First Floor, Police Station, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

¶28

The Inspector of Police,

¶29

R6 Kumaran Nagar Police Station, Jafferkhanpet, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 056.

¶30

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶31

+1cc to Mr.C.B.Muralikrishnan,Advocate in sr.no.22228 (29/11/18)

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.27213 of 2018
CS/28/11/2018

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Ravindran v. Deputy Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Ravindran v. Deputy Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Senthilkumar Vs M.P.Murugavel

T.M.Arulanantham Vs B.Nadhiya

Mr.T.Ravi, M/52 Yrs Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Santhosh Vs State by

A.Arulnathan Vs the State Rep. by Its

Arun Jain Vs Ashok Tex