The petitioner filed a Criminal Original Petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The counsel for the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
The Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.11.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P.No.24432 of 2015 & M.P.No.1 of 2015
A.Arulnathan ..Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State rep. by its
Inspector of Police,
Krishnapuram Police Station,
Dharmapuri Taluk,
Dharmapuri District.
2.S.Sakthi ..Respondent
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section
482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records and to quash the First
Information Report in Crime No.296 of 2012 dated 07.11.2012 on
the file of the 1 st respondent in respect of the petitioner
alone.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Gopalakrishnan
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this criminal original petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Arulnathan
The State
S.Sakthi
N.Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
