Disposed

D.Krishnamurthy v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Nov 2018CRL OP/25794/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the court directed the police to immediately secure the accused, complete the investigation, and file a final report within two months regarding an offence under Sections 460 and 420 IPC where the investigation remained incomplete despite bail cancellation.

What did the court decide?

Direction to immediately secure the accused and complete investigation and file final report within two months.

D.Krishnamurthy Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 16.11.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.25794 of 2018

¶6

D.Krishnamurthy .. Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.State by The Inspector of Police, T11, Thirunindravur Police Station, Crime No.830 of 2015.

¶9

2.Joshwa Suresh Kumar .. Respondents

¶10

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the first respondent to secure the second respondent and produce him before the Learned JM-II, Thiruvallur and to file final report expeditiously in Crime No.830/2015, dated 15.07.2015.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.Sunder Mohan For R1 : Mr.C.Raghavan Government Advocate(Crl.Side) O R D E R

¶12

This petition has been filed seeking for securing the accused person and also for a direction to the respondent police to file a final report as expeditiously as possible in Crime No.830 of 2015.

¶13

It is seen from the records, that the respondent police have registered an FIR for an offence under Sections 460, 420 of IPC. Initially, bail was granted in favour of accused person and subsequently, the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur in Criminal Revision Petition No.4 of 2016 had passed an order cancelling the bail granted in favour of the accused person. Even thereafter, the accused person has not been secured and there has been no improvement in the investigation conducted by the respondent police.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the first respondent police is directed to immediately secure the accused person and complete the investigation and file a final report within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶17

Sd/-

¶18

Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)

¶19

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ub/ssr
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
T11, Thirunindravur Police Station.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.Sunder Mohan, Advocate, S.R.No.78173
Crl.O.P.No.25794 of 2018
BS(CO)
SSM(06/12/2018)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Krishnamurthy v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Krishnamurthy v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vighas, Aged 31 Years, Vs the State Rep. by

Dr.P.Gokulakrishnan, Vs State Rep. by

Lakshmana Sundar Vs D.Aiswarya Npm

Kiruthika, Vs State Rep.by

K.Prabakaran Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by Its

Shanmugam Vs State Rep. by