A one-line order in a petition for anticipatory bail where the court directed the Additional Public Prosecutor to observe a closed inquiry order produced by him.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twelfth day of December Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.25246 of 2018
1 MOHAN KUMAR [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ]
2 ELLAPPAN
3 VASANTHAKUMARI
4 BALAJI
5 ELANGOVAN
Vs
STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ]
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
K-4, ALL WOMAN POLICE STATION,
ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI.
CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018.
For Petitioner : M/S.T.SHANMUGAM Advocate For Respondent : MR. M.PRABHAVATHI, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard both sides.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-4 ALL WOMAN POLICE STATION, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI.
CC to M/S.T.SHANMUGAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.25246/2018
Date :12/12/2018
TA-24/12/2018
MOHAN KUMAR
STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
