Allowed

Veda Arun Nagarajan v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC7 Dec 2018CRL OP/28644/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Original Petition seeking modification of bail conditions imposed by a Judicial Magistrate. The Court modified the requirement to appear before police daily to appearing before the Magistrate for two weeks, thereafter as required for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

The condition to appear before police daily was modified to appear before the Judicial Magistrate for two weeks and thereafter before police as required.

Veda Arun Nagarajan Vs the State Rep. by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.12.2018 CORAM:

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶3

CRL.O.P.No.28644 of 2018

¶4

Veda Arun Nagarajan

¶5

Vs.

¶6

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Neelangarai Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.1695 of 2018.

¶7

... Respondent

¶8

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439(1)(b) Cr.P.C. praying to modify the condition imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur in Cr.M.P.No.6426 of 2018 by order dated 19.11.2018 in crime No.1695 of 2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, J-8, Neelangarai Police Station.

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

This petition has been filed for modification of the conditions imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur in Cr.M.P.No.6426 of 2018 by order dated 19.11.2018 in crime No.1695 of 2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, J-8, Neelangarai Police Station.

¶11

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was granted bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur in Cr.M.P.No.6426 of 2018 by order dated 19.11.2018 by imposing condition directing the petitioner to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of 30 days and the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly from 25.11.2018. Now, he prays to modify the said condition imposed on the petitioner.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

3.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

¶14

4.Considering the above said submissions, the condition imposed as against the petitioner is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur at 10.30 am for a period of two weeks instead of the respondent police and thereafter shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶15

5.This Criminal Original Petition is ordered accordingly.

¶16

Sd/-

¶17

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

¶21

1.The Judicial Magistrate,

¶22

Alandur

¶23

2.The Inspector of Police, Neelangarai Police Station,

¶24

Chennai.

¶25

3.The Public Prosecutor,

¶26

High Court of Madras, Chennai.

¶27

+1cc to Mr.S.Suresh, Advocate, S.R.No.87269

¶28

CRL.O.P.No.28644 of 2018

¶29

(CO)

¶30

GSP(17/12/2018)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Veda Arun Nagarajan v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veda Arun Nagarajan v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Gunaseelan Vs Iop Thiruvallur

Palanivel Vs State Represented by

A.Vikash Vs the State by

Imrankhan @ Karthick Vs State Rep by

Javithbasha Vs State Rep by

A.Satheeshkumar Vs the Inspector of Police