Shajahan v. Iop,Saidapet, Chennai.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. closed after Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the underlying criminal complaint investigation was completed.
What did the court decide?
The criminal original petition is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twelfth day of December Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.23085 of 2018
SHAJAHAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REPRESENTED BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE (CRIME), J-1, SAIDAPET POLICE STATION, CHENNAI - 600 015. CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018
For Petitioner : M/S.U.VINOTHKUMAR Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.M.PRABHAVATHI, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR For Intervenor : M/S.S.MOHAN Advocate
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHAJAHAN
- respondent
STATE
Coram
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court