Remanded

Shajitha Ali v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC28 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/2373/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In bail matter CRL.MP(MD) No.2373 of 2018, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court relaxed the bail condition imposed on the petitioner, requiring his appearance only upon receipt of summons, noting compliance with existing conditions.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed on the petitioner is fully relaxed; he shall appear before the Court concerned only on receipt of summons.

Shajitha Ali Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.2373 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.13697 of 2017

¶7

SHAJITHA ALI ... PETITIONER/PETITIONR/1^st PETITIONER

¶8

¶9

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPRANKUNDRAM, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO. 06/2017. ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition as imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.MP (MD)No. 265/2018 in Crl.OP(MD)No. 13697/2017 dated 12.01.2018

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.SOLAISAMY, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶12

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.(MD).No.265 of 2018 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13697 of 2017, dated 12.01.2018.

¶13

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶14

3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner is complying with the condition without any https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ deviation from 14.11.2017 to till date. He further submitted that

¶15

the charge sheet has been filed.

¶16

¶17

Considering the nature of offence committed by the petitioner and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner is complying with the condition without any deviation from 14.11.2017, hence, the condition imposed on the petitioner is fully relaxed. However, the petitioner shall appear before the Court concerned, only on receipt of summons.

¶18

5.This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶19

sd/-

¶20

28/03/2018

¶21

/ TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶23

Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

¶25

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, MADURAI.

¶26

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

¶27

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶28

ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPRANKUNDRAM,

¶29

MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶30

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶31

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

ORDER

¶33

¶34

CRL MP(MD) No.2373 of 2018

¶35

¶36

CRL OP(MD) No.13697 of 2017

¶37

Date :28/03/2018

¶38

PK/RR/SAR-1/09.04.2018 : 2P/5C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Shajitha Ali v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shajitha Ali v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Kavialagan Vs the Inspector of Police

Periyakaruppu Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Muthusamy Vs the Inspector of Police

Marichamy Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Vaithiyanathan Vs the Inspector of Police

Kappal Raja @ Kandasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police