Allowed

Suresh @ Sureshkumar v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Madras HC26 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/2306/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court relaxed the strict conditions imposed in the earlier bail order on the petitioner. Relying on the respondent's submission that the petitioner has complied since February 5, 2018 and investigation continues, the frequency of appearance was modified to once a week on Mondays.

What did the court decide?

Relief granted: Pupil appearing before police once a week every Monday at 10.30 a.m. instead of earlier conditions.

Suresh @ Sureshkumar Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.2306 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.1146 of 2018

¶6

SURESH @ SURESHKUMAR ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER

¶7

¶8

THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.O.P. (MD).NO.1146 of 2018 dated 25.01.2018

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.SATHYA CHIDAMBARAM, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶11

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1146 of 2018, dated 25.07.2018.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶13

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner is abiding the condition from 05.02.2018 without any deviation. Further he added that the investigation is not yet completed.

¶14

Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner is abiding https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the condition without any deviation and the investigation is not yet completed, hence, the earlier condition imposed on the petitioner is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall appear before the

¶15

respondent police once in a week, i.e., on every Monday, at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶16

Accordingly, this petition is ordered. sd/26/03/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶17

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶18

¶19

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATHANKULAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT

¶20

2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT

¶21

3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION,

¶22

THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT

¶23

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶24

+1. C.C. to M/S.S.SATHYA CHIDAMBARAM Advocate SR.No.4867 pjl JAM/28/03/2018/ CM-VR / SAR 2 / 2p-6c

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Suresh @ Sureshkumar v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh @ Sureshkumar v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Raffiq Vs the Inspector of Police

V. Ramakrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police

Sofia Vs the Inspector of Police

Arockiyam Vs the Inspector of Police

Akbar @ Akbar Ali Vs the Inspector of Police

J. Judu Alisa Judu Arthar Vs the Inspector of Police