Allowed

Akbar @ Akbar Ali v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC26 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/2304/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought relaxation of bail conditions imposed by the High Court. The Court found the petitioner compliant with conditions since January 29, 2018. Bail was granted on a more lenient condition of attending only upon receipt of a summons. Application allowed.

What did the court decide?

Condition imposed on the petitioner is fully relaxed; petitioner shall appear before the Court concerned only on receipt of summons.

Akbar @ Akbar Ali Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of March Two Thousand and Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.2304 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.1018 of 2018

¶6

AKBAR @ AKBAR ALI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.6

¶7

¶8

THE STATE REP. BY

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL. IN CRIME NO. 1712/2010 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.OP(MD) No. 1018/2018 dated 23.01.2018

¶11

Order: This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.M.A.JINNAH, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1018 of 2018, dated 23.01.2018.

¶13

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶14

3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted

¶15

that the petitioner is complying with the condition without any deviation from 29.01.2018 till date. He further submitted that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

charge sheet has been filed.

¶17

Considering the nature of offence committed by the petitioner and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner is complying with the condition without any deviation from 29.01.2018, the condition imposed on the petitioner is fully relaxed. However, the petitioner shall appear before the Court concerned, only on receipt of summons.

¶18

5.This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶19

sd/26/03/2018

¶20

/ TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶22

Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, DINDIGUL.

¶25

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

¶27

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

ORDER

¶29

¶30

CRL MP(MD) No.2304 of 2018 IN

¶31

CRL OP(MD) No.1018 of 2018

¶32

Date :26/03/2018

¶33

SDS/PMI/SAR.4/06.04.2018/2P/5C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Akbar @ Akbar Ali v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akbar @ Akbar Ali v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Raffiq Vs the Inspector of Police

V. Ramakrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police

Sofia Vs the Inspector of Police

Arockiyam Vs the Inspector of Police

Suresh @ Sureshkumar Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

J. Judu Alisa Judu Arthar Vs the Inspector of Police