Partly allowed

Rajamanickam v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC23 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/2254/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous petition was filed to relax bail conditions. The court modified the previous order to mandate the petitioners' appearance before the police station once a week on Mondays.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed in the earlier order was modified to require the petitioners to appear before the respondent Police once a week on Mondays at 10.30 am.

Rajamanickam Vs the Inspector of Police — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Friday, the Twenty Third day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.2254 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.2299 of 2018

¶6

1 RAJAMANICKAM

¶7

2 RAJKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / PETITIONERS

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶10

(CRIME NO. 523/2017) ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.OP(MD)NO. 2299/2018 dated 14.02.2018

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.V.RAMALINGAM, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.A.ROBINSON, on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

This Petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD).No. 2299 of 2018, dated 14.02.2018.

¶14

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶15

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioners herein are complying with the condition regularly, without any deviation and he further submitted that the charge sheet is not yet filed.

¶16

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Advocate (Crl.Side), the condition already imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD).No. 2299 of 2018, dated 14.02.2018, is

¶17

modified to the extent that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent Police once in a week i.e on every Monday at 10.30 am until further orders.

¶18

sd/23/03/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶20

Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

TO 1 THE JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT FOR EC & NDPS ACT CASES, MADURAI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. C.C. to M/S.V.RAMALINGAM Advocate SR.No.4617 TRP

¶22

JAM/28/03/2018/ CM-VR / SAR 2 / 2P-5C

¶23

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.2254 of 2018 IN

¶24

CRL OP(MD) No.2299 of 2018

¶25

Date :23/03/2018

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rajamanickam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajamanickam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagarajan Vs the Inspector of Police

Sundar Deva Vs the Sub-Inspectof of Police

Mohamed Hanifa Vs the Inspector of Police

Mohammed Raffiq Vs the Inspector of Police

V. Ramakrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police

Sofia Vs the Inspector of Police