Allowed

Mohamed Hanifa v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/2096/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court modified the conditions of bail for the petitioner, Mohamed Hanifa, directing him to appear daily at 10:30 AM before the Additional Mahila Court, Madurai, until further orders, noting his compliance and ongoing investigation.

What did the court decide?

Order to appear before the Additional Mahila Court, Madurai, daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

Mohamed Hanifa Vs the Inspector of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Twenty Second day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶6

MOHAMED HANIFA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1

¶7

¶8

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT (IN CRIME NO.81 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to modify the condition imposed in Crl.MP(MD).No. 1645 of 2018 dated 06.03.18 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 2220 of 2018 dated 15.02.2018 and direct the petitioner to appear before the learned Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial level), Madurai instead of appearing before the respondent police daily 10.30am., until further order

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.M.A.JINNAH, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.SUYMABULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate(Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent and MR.M.JAGADEESH PANDIAN, for Intervenor, the court made the following order:-

¶11

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.(MD).No.1645 of 2018 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2220 of 2018, dated 06.03.2018

¶12

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶13

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner is abiding the condition from 24.02.2018 without any deviation. Further he added that the investigation is not yet completed.

¶14

Considering the submission made by the learned Government https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner is abiding the condition without any deviation and the investigation is not yet

¶15

¶16

completed, hence, the earlier condition imposed on the petitioner is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall appear before the Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial Level), Madurai, daily at at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶17

Accordingly, this petition is ordered.

¶18

sd/22/03/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

¶21

1 THE ADDITIONAL MAHILA COURT/ (MAGISTERIAL LEVEL), MADURAI

¶22

2 DO THROUGH THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI

¶23

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶24

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALLINAGARAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

¶25

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶26

+1. C.C. to M/S.S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate SR.No.4711

¶27

SMA/RR-CSL/SAR-1/27.03.2018:2P/7c

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mohamed Hanifa v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohamed Hanifa v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharathi Vs Tamilnesan

Tamilarasan Vs the Inspector of Police

Anbuselvan Vs the Inspector of Police

Nagarajan Vs the Inspector of Police

Sundar Deva Vs the Sub-Inspectof of Police

P.Sivakumar Vs the Inspector of Police