Partly allowed

R.Prabha v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/2052/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous petition sought relaxation of the appearance condition imposed on an accused. The court modified the condition requiring monthly appearance instead of more frequent ones, noting the petitioner's compliance and pending investigation.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed on the petitioner shall be modified to appear before the Court once in every month on the first working day at 10.30 a.m.

R.Prabha Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Twentieth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.2052 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6124 of 2017

¶6

R.PRABHA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2

¶7

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY CITY, (CRIME NO.28/2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl MP(MD)NO. 171/2018 in Crl OP (MD)NO. 6124/2017 dated 10.01.2018

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.C.SUSIKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶11

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6124 of 2017, dated 10.01.2018.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶13

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner is abiding the condition from 21.01.2018 without any deviation. Further he added that the investigation is not yet completed.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner is abiding the condition without any deviation and the investigation is not yet completed, hence, the earlier condition imposed on the petitioner is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall appear before the Court concerned once in every month, i.e., on first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶16

Accordingly, This petition is ordered.

¶17

sd/20/03/2018

¶18

/ TRUE COPY /

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

¶21

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2 TRICHY

¶22

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY DISTRICT

¶23

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY CITY,

¶24

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶25

+1. C.C. to M/S.C.SUSIKUMAR Advocate SR.No.4609

¶26

PJL

¶27

GJM/CSL/RR/SAR-2-27.3.18-2P-6C

¶28

ORDER

¶29

IN CRL MP(MD) No.2052 of 2018 IN

¶30

CRL OP(MD) No.6124 of 2017 Date :20/03/2018 (2/3)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Prabha v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Prabha v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mani Vs the Inspector of Police

Soundararajan Vs the Inspector of Police

Gopal Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Vijaya Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Prabha Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Prabha Vs the Inspector of Police