The court dismissed the review application for default due to the absence of the petitioner. No substantive legal question was adjudicated as the matter was not taken up for hearing.
Review application dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
V.Kannan
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.06.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
REV.APLC(MD).No.187 of 2018
... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.,
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 114 Code of Civil Procedure, to allow the review and set aside the order dated 26.09.2018 passed in CRP.No.1407 of 2016 on the file of this Court.
Prayer in CRP(MD)No.1407 of 2016 : The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the constitution of India, against the order passed in E.P.No.139 of 2015 in R.C.O.P.No.57 of 2011 dated 01.04.2016 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Maudurai Town.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 12.06.2019, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the case was posted today (ie., 13.06.2019). Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Review Application is dismissed for default.
Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
Rmk
To
The Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town.
REV.APLC(MD).No.187 of 2018
KS(12.07.2019) 1 P 2 C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.Kannan
S.Rajendran
Vasantha Rajendran
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
