Partly allowed

Mathu Moorthy@ Krishna Moorthy v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/1905/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge of the Madras High Court granted an extension of time for the petitioners to produce sureties following an earlier order of anticipatory bail, stating that the time was extended for a further period of two weeks from the date of the order.

What did the court decide?

The time for producing sureties was extended for a further period of two weeks from the date of the order.

Mathu Moorthy@ Krishna Moorthy Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.1905 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.1733 of 2018

¶6

1 MATHU MOORTHY @ KRISHNA MOORTHY

¶7

2 VIJAYA LAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI DISTRICT, MADURAI CR.NO.3 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extend the time granted in Crl.OP(MD)NO. 1733/2018 dated 12.02.2018 on the file of this Honourable court

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.G. MOHANKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioners and of MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

This Petition has been filed to extend the time granted by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1733 of 2018, dated 12.02.2018, for producing sureties.

¶13

This Court, by order dated 12.02.2018 made in Crl.O.P(MD)No. 1733 of 2018, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner and directed the petitioners to appear before the concerned Magistrate, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy was made ready. However, the petitioners did not comply with conditions, within the time prescribed by this Court. Hence, the petitioners has approached this Court with the present petition for extension of time.

¶14

3.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) on the said submission.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this

¶16

petition is ordered and the time for executing the sureties is extended for a further period of two weeks from today.

¶17

/ TRUE COPY /

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶19

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶20

Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

¶22

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, MADURAI.

¶23

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶24

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH,

¶25

MADURAI DISTRICT, MADURAI.

¶26

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶27

+1. C.C. to M/S.G. MOHANKUMAR Advocate SR.No.4023

¶28

MKV-MM-PN-SAR 3/13.3.2018/2P-6C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mathu Moorthy@ Krishna Moorthy v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mathu Moorthy@ Krishna Moorthy v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Ravikumaran, Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Vaithiyanathan Vs the Inspector of Police

Kandasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

C.Sakthivel, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramesh Vs the Inspector of Police

Madasamy Vs the Inspector of Police