Disposed

Ramesh v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/1904/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail matter, the Hon'ble Madras High Court modified a relaxation condition imposed on the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to appear once a week until further orders, noting the investigation was incomplete but the petitioner complied with previous conditions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once in a week on every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

Ramesh Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.1904 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.2420 of 2018

¶6

RAMESH ... PETITIONER/PETITONER

¶7

¶8

THE STATE REP.BY ITS, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SRIVAIKUNDAM POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT

¶9

(CRIME NO. 24/2018) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner vide order dated 15.02.2018 made in Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 2420 of 2018 on the file of this Honourable High Court

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl.side)for the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2420 of 2018, dated 15.02.2018.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶14

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing

¶15

for the State submitted that the petitioner is abiding the condition https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ from 18.12.2017 without any deviation. Further he added that the investigation is not yet completed.

¶16

Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner is abiding the condition without any deviation and the investigation is not yet completed, hence, the earlier condition imposed on the petitioner is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once in a week, i.e., on every Monday, at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶17

Accordingly, this petition is ordered.

¶18

sd/-

¶19

13/03/2018

¶20

/ TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶22

Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM,

¶25

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TUTICORIN DISTRICT

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶27

SRIVAIKUNDAM POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT

¶28

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶29

+1. C.C. to M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate SR.No.4102

¶30

PJL

¶31

GJM/CSL/RR/SAR-4-19.3.18-2P-6C

¶32

ORDER IN

¶33

CRL MP(MD) No.1904 of 2018

¶34

¶35

CRL OP(MD) No.2420 of 2018

¶36

Date :13/03/2018

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ramesh v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Ravikumaran, Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Vaithiyanathan Vs the Inspector of Police

Kandasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

C.Sakthivel, Vs the Inspector of Police

Mathu Moorthy@ Krishna Moorthy Vs the Inspector of Police

Madasamy Vs the Inspector of Police