Disposed

Vasanthamani, F/67 Years v. State Rep by

Madras HC25 Jul 2018CRL MP/9613/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner sought relaxation of a reporting condition imposed during a bail matter. The High Court ordered the relaxation of the daily reporting requirement, subject to availability when summoned.

What did the court decide?

Relaxation of the daily reporting condition imposed by the court in Crl.O.P.No.15316 of 2018, subject to availability when required.

Vasanthamani, F/67 Years Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Fifth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.9613 of 2018

IN CRL OP.15316/2018

VASANTHAMANI,

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, H-4, KORUKKUPET POLICE STATION, KORUKKUPET, CHENNAI - 600 073. CR.NO.363 OF 2018

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition of reporting before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am until further orders, imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.O.P.No.15316 of 2018 dated 22.06.2018.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.BABU MUTHU MEERAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. M.MOHAMED RIYAZ, Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶13

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.15316 of 2018 on 22.06.2018.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P.No.15316 of 2018 on 22.06.2018 regularly, and he prayed for relaxation of the said condition.

¶15

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶16

Taking into consideration of the submissions made by both the counsels, the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P.No.15316 of 2018 on 22.06.2018 is relaxed. However, the petitioner will himself be available, as and when required by the respondent.

¶17

-sd/-

¶18

25/07/2018

¶19

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶20

TRUE COPY

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶22

¶23

1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.XV, GEORGE TOWN, CHENNAI.

¶24

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶25

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶26

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, H-4, KORUKKUPET POLICE STATION, KORUKKUPET, CHENNAI - 600 073.

¶27

+1 C.C. to M/S.M.BABU MUTHU MEERAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.13844

¶28

Order

¶29

in CRL MP.9613/2018 in CRL OP.15316/2018

¶30

Date :25/07/2018

¶31

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶32

TA-30/07/2018

Vasanthamani, F/67 Years v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vasanthamani, F/67 Years v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prathap Naidu, Vs the State Rep by Its

Jaganathan, Aged 62 Years, Vs State Rep. by

E.Arunkumar, Aged 22 Years, Vs State by

Kathiravan, Aged 28 Years Vs State Rep. by

M.Shamla, Aged 33 Years Vs State by

Mohamed Nazeer, Aged 58 Years, Vs the State