Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

E.Arunkumar, Aged 22 Years, Vs State by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

Home
Madras HC
2018
E.Arunkumar, Aged 22 Years, Vs State byE.Arunkumar, Aged 22 Years, v. State by

Disposed

E.Arunkumar, Aged 22 Years, v. State by

Madras HC24 Jul 2018CRL MP/9444/2018

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Criminal…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Tuesday, the Twenty Fourth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen

PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.9444 of 2018

IN CRL OP.16081/2018

E.ARUNKUMAR,

[ PETITIONER ]

Vs

STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, STEEL PLANT POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT. CR.NO. 156 OF 2018

[ RESPONDENT ]

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am until further orders in Crl.O.P.No. 16081 of 2018 dated 22.6.2018.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
E.ARUNKUMAR
respondent
STATE

Coram

AI extract

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 24 Jul 2018 · July
Registered: 16 Jul 2018
Case no.: CRL MP/9444/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from A.d.jagadish Chandira

Rajamani, Aged 56 Years Vs State Rep. by
23 Jul 2018
M.Prabakaran, Aged 28 Years Vs the State Rep. by
23 Jul 2018
Kirubaharan, Aged 33 Years Vs the State Rep. by
23 Jul 2018
Prathap Naidu, Vs the State Rep by Its
24 Jul 2018

Cite this judgement

E.Arunkumar, Aged 22 Years, v. State by, CRL MP/9444/2018 (MAD), decided on 24 July 2018.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

Parties & counsel

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.P.VEERARAGHAVAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. M.MOHAMED RIYAZ, Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.16081 of 2018 on 22.06.2018.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P.No.16081 of 2018 on 22.06.2018 regularly, and he prayed for relaxation of the said condition.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

Taking into consideration of the submissions made by both the counsels, the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P.No.16081 of 2018 on 22.06.2018 is relaxed. However, the petitioner will himself be available, as and when required by the respondent.

-sd/-

24/07/2018

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

TRUE COPY

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, SALEM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SALEM. [FOR INFORMATION]

3 THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SALEM.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, STEEL PLANT POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.

5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

C.C. to M/S.P.VEERARAGHAVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

Order

in CRL MP.9444/2018

in CRL OP.16081/2018

Date :24/07/2018

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

TA-30/07/2018

CNR

HCMA011325562018

Topic

Bail and Remand

Bench

A.d.jagadish Chandira

Disposal

ORDERED

Jaganathan, Aged 62 Years, Vs State Rep. by

24 Jul 2018

S.Jawahar, M/a 39 Yrs, Vs the Inspector of Police

24 Jul 2018