R.Sasikala, F/a 54 Years, v. the State Rep by Its
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought relaxation of the condition to appear monthly before the special court during her appeal. The High Court rejected the prayer as the order was recent.
Petitioner sought relaxation of the condition to appear monthly before the special court during her appeal. The High Court rejected the prayer as the order was recent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Eighteenth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.7953 of 2018
IN CRL A.232/2018
R.SASIKALA [ PETITIONER ]
Vs
THE STATE REP BY ITS, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTION, NAMAKKAL, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT CR.NO.4/AC/2001.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the conditions that the petitioner shall appear before the Special Judge Chief Judicial Magistrate, Namakkal, Namakkal District on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m till the disposal of the Appeal imposed in Crl.A.No.232 of 2018, dated 09.04.2018.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.C.PRAKASAM, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.PRABAKAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-
This Court while suspending the sentence pending appeal, imposed condition to appear before the trial Court once in a month.
2 This order was passed very recently. Hence, there is no necessity to relax the condition within a period of two months.
3 Hence, the petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition after six months.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE SPECIAL JUDGE / CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NAMAKKAL, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTION NAMAKKAL, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT.
C.C. to M/S.C.PRAKASAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges
Order
in
CRL MP.7953/2018
in
CRL A.232/2018
Date :18/06/2018
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
MK:21/06/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the conditions of appearance before the special court for the petitioner tainted by her pending appeal should be relaxed.
R. SASIKALA
THE STATE REP BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTION NAMAKKAL
G. JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court