Kumar @ Uthirakumar, v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed to suspend imprisonment sentences imposed by a lower court was dismissed as withdrawn by consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Fourth day of December Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. PARTHIBAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.11604 of 2018
AND CRL.A.NO.526 of 2018
KUMAR @ UTHIRAKUMAR, [ PETITIONER ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PANRUTI. CR.NO.12 OF 2016.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to suspend the suspend the sentence of rigorous Imprisonment for 14 years for the offence under section 376 (i) of IPC and a fine of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) in default 2 years simple imprisonment to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 2 years for the offence under Section 451 of IPC and fine of 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) in default 6 months simple imprisonment and to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months for the offence under section 506 (ii) of IPC and fine of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand only) in default 2 month simple imprisonment imposed by its judgment dated 30.07.2018 by Hon'ble Mahila Court at Cuddalore in S.C.No. 26 of 2017.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.SHANKAR, Advocate for the petitioner, and of MR. V.SARATHA DEVI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side), on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the said submission and the endorsement so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
-sd/-
04/12/2018
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE MAHILA COURT,
CUDDALORE.
2 THE SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL PRISON, CUDDALORE.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
PANRUTI.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
C.C. to M/S.S.SHANKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges
Order
in
CRL MP.11604/2018
in
CRL.A.NO.526/2018
Date :04/12/2018
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
TA-10/12/2018
KUMAR @ UTHIRAKUMAR
STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANRUTI
V. PARTHIBAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court