Dismissed

The Assistant Commissioner of v. M/S.Sri Jeyalakshmi Printing

Madras HC24 Sept 2018CRL A/710/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the criminal appeal as withdrawn. It directed the appellant department to deduct litigation expenses from officials responsible for the case's delay and conduct disciplinary proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Directing the appellant department to deduct litigation expenses from responsible officials and remit the amount to the Government exchequer.

The Assistant Commissioner of Vs M/S.Sri Jeyalakshmi Printing — Madras HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATE : 24.09.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶5

Criminal Appeal No.710 of 2013

¶6

The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise Erode Division

¶7

Now Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise Erode I Division. ... Appellant

¶8

.. Vs ..

¶9

1.M/s Sri Jeyalakshmi Printing Mills

¶10

Rep. By its Partner Mr.N.R.Nachimuthu

¶11

No.130-A/SF.No.327/2, Perundurai Road

¶12

Pudur, Pudupalayam, Erode.

¶13

2.Mr.N.R.Nachimuthu ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order of acquittal of the respondents passed by the Additional District Judge-II, Erode passed in Criminal Appeal No.96/2011 dated 10/10/2012 and restore the order of the conviction passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Erode passed in C.C.No.562 of 1999 dated 09/08/2011.

¶15

For Appellant : Mr.V.Sundareswaran

¶16

For Respondents : Ms.Zeenath Begam for R2

¶17

R2-died (Memo filed)

¶18

R1-NO appearance (Notice sd)

¶19

JUDGMENT

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶21

This Court has directed the 2^nd respondent to give particulars of the 1^st respondent company. For which, the 2^nd respondent sent notice to the 1^st respondent, and it has been returned with “No such addressee”. Neither the 2^nd respondent nor the appellant can able to find out the 1^st respondent.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

The appellant, being an Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Erode, not able to verify whether the 1^st respondent company is now existing or not. The Criminal Appeal is pending before this Court for the past 5 years, due to the irresponsibility of the government officials, who hold the post of Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Erode. For these years, which highly caused waste of judicial time. Further, because of filing of this Criminal Appeal, there is a loss to the Government exchequer. Therefore, directing the appellant Department to deduct the amount which was spent for litigation expenses in respect of this case, would meet the ends of justice.

¶24

In view of the above, the appellant Department is directed to deduct the amount which was spent towards litigation expenses in respect of this case from the officials who are responsible viz., who hold the post of Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Erode, from 21.10.2013 to till today, and remit the same to the account of Government exchequer. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this Judgment and the same shall be communicated to the Registrar Judicial of this Court. Further, this Court directs the Department to conduct disciplinary proceedings against the officers concerned for being not taking any steps to find out the 1^st respondent company.

¶25

With the above observation, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶26

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

Jer To

¶28

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Erode.

¶29

2.-Do- thro The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode.

¶30

The Additional District Judge-II, Erode.

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

The Registrar Judicial Madras High Court.

¶33

Copy to

¶34

1.The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise,
Erode Division,
Now Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise,
Erode-1 Division.
2.The Section Officer,
Criminal Section, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.Sundareswaran, Advocate Sr.65882
+1cc to M/S. Zeenath Begum, Advocate Sr.65897
Criminal Appeal No.710 of 2013
mg[co]
srg 2/3/2019

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Assistant Commissioner of v. M/S.Sri Jeyalakshmi Printing

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Assistant Commissioner of v. M/S.Sri Jeyalakshmi Printing

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sivabakkiam Vs N.Gejalakshmi

Mani@Manikandan, Vs State

Ganesan Vs Krishnan

Kannaiyan Vs the Inspector of Police

Kandasamy Vs the Competent Authority

Lakshmanan Kumar Vs the Public Prosecutor