Ganesan v. Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Crpc revision filed to set aside conviction allowed as parties executed joint compromise memo after patenting entire dues to complainant. Court quashed judgment and released bail bonds.
What did the court decide?
Criminal revision allowed; judgment of conviction set aside; bail bond cancelled; trial court directed to refund deposited amount.
What the court decided
Bail Slip
That the Appellant/Accused namely Ganesan S/o.Munisami was released on bail as per order of this court dated 15.03.2013 in MP.1/2013 in Crl.R.C.No.359/2013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 20.09.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.R.C.No.359 of 2013
Ganesan ...Petitioner/Appellant/Accused
Vs.
Krishnan ...Respondent/Respondent/Complainant
This Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against judgment of conviction dated 13.02.2013 made in C.A.No.46 of 2010 by the learned Additional District Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri, confirming the sentence and conviction imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Hosur, in S.T.C.No.925 of 2009 by order dated 27.07.2010.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision should be allowed on account of compromise and settlement of dues between parties.
Whether the judgment of conviction should be set aside upon execution of a joint compromise memo.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ganesan
- respondent
Krishnan
Coram
P.Velmurugan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court