The Madurai Bench dismissed the contempt petition as infructuous. Counsel submitted that the prayer sought in the petition regarding the stay order in a previous proceeding became infructuous, resulting in the dismissal of the current petition without costs.
The contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Contempt Petition (MD) No.101 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.20448 of 2013
A.Senthil Kumar .. Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.Rengaraj,
Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Kumbakonam Division.
2.Chandrasekar
General Manager,
The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Kumbakonam. .. Contemnors/Respondents
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein for their willful and wanton disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 in W.P.(MD)No.20448 of 2013, dated 07.01.2014 under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Prayer in MP(MD)No.1/2013 in WP(MD)No.20448/2013 :
To stay the operation of the Impugned Order of the 1st respondent in his Proceedings No.TA.AA.RD.Ka.Kumba/Trichy/T5/5743/ 2006 dated 31.12.2010.
Prayer in WP(MD)No.20448/2013 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Impugned Order of the 1st respondent in his Proceedings No. TA AA RD Ka Kumba/Trichy/T5/5743/2006 dated 31.12.2010 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Murugaamannar For Respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer
2
sought for in this contempt petition has become infructuous and hence, this petition may be dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
RJ2
TE/KK/SAR-2 : 20/03/2018 : 2P/2C
Contempt Petition (MD) No.101 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.20448 of 2013
20.02.2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed as the sought prayer has become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Senthil Kumar
1.Rengaraj
2.Chandrasekar
Justice S.Vimala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
