R.Bommanna Chettiar v. v.Sampath
Case brief
What is this about?
This Court closed a contempt petition after finding that the respondent (District Collector) complied with the previous order by directing the Revenue Divisional Officer to refer the matter to the Sub-Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed; the case is to be referred to the Sub-Court within two weeks.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.09.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.836 of 2017
R.Bommanna Chettiar,
No.9/3, Mariamman Koil Street,
Jarikondalampatty,
Salem District. ... Petitioner
-vs-
Mr.V.Sampath,
The District Collector,
Salem District,
Salem-636 001. ... Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for
willfully and wantonly disobeying the order of this Court
dated 22.07.2016 in Contempt Petition No.1666 of 2016.
For Petitioner :Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondent :Mr.K.Rajendra Prasad, Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
Finally, the respondent has complied with the orders
passed by this Court and a proceedings to the said effect https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent had willfully disobeyed the order of this Court dated 22.07.2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Bommanna Chettiar
- respondent
V.Sampath
Coram
T.S.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court