In this contempt petition filed for wilful disobedience, the court accepted the submission that the court order had been complied with albeit belatedly, and closed the petition without imposing punishment.
Contempt petition closed; no punishment imposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.09.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.1125 of 2017
.. Respondents
Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 01.02.2016 made in W.P.No.3475 of 2016.
For Petitioners :: Mr.R.Thirugnanam For Respondents :: Mr.M.Thamizharasan Government Advocate for R1 Mr.P.Sesubalan Raja for R2
2
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing on either side submitted that the order and direction issued by the Court has been complied with, though belatedly. Recording the same, the contempt petition is closed.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
ss
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2018.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
PS/18/09/2018
one cc to Government pleader Sr.No.13718
one cc to Government Pleader Sr.No.13023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused is liable for contempt for belated compliance with the order dated 01.02.2016.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tmt. S. Thulasi
Minor S. Murugan
Minor S. Priya
Minor S. Anand
Konangi
Mrs. E. Sundaravalli
T.S. Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
