Disposed

R. Dhandapani v. Mr. Balaraman

Madras HC10 Dec 2018CONT P/744/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971. No orders were necessary as the underlying dispute was settled out of court via a joint memo dated 24.08.2018, which relinquished the employer-employee relationship. The petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed as no orders are necessary due to the out-of-court settlement of the underlying dispute.

R. Dhandapani Vs Mr. Balaraman — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10.12.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN

¶6

Cont.P.No.744 of 2016
R.Dhandapani ... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Venkataramana,
The Management of DELVAC Pumps (P) Ltd.,
A.C.17A, SIDCO Industrial Estate,
Thirumudivakkam,
Chennai 600 044.
cause title amended as per order dated 05.10.2017
in Sub Application (OS) No.688 of 2016 in Cont.P.No.744 of
2016
... Respondent
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act 1971, to punish the respondent for willful
disobedience in not complying with the order of this Court
dated 03.09.2014 in M.P.No.3 of 2013 in W.P.No.14800 of
2013.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jaikumar

¶8

For Respondent : Mr.A.R.Nixon

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The petitioner has filed this contempt petition to

¶13

punish the respondent for disobeying the order of this Court dated 03.09.2014 in M.P.No.3 of 2013 in W.P.No.14800 of 2013.

¶14

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, it is represented by the learned counsel for the respondent that a writ appeal in W.A.No.1142 of 2018 has been filed against the order dated 03.09.2014 before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court.

¶15

In the said circumstances, a joint memo of settlement dated 24.08.2018, was filed and on the basis of which, the writ appeal was disposed of on 29.08.2018. According to the joint memo that the issue between the

¶16

Management and the workman has been settled out of Court and the workman has received all the dues payable by the Management towards full and final settlement and the relationship of the employer and the employee got relinquished.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

¶19

In view of the same, this Court finds that no orders are necessary in the contempt petition and therefore, the same is closed.

¶20

SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
gsk
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
PS/10/01/2019
To
The Management of DELVAC Pumps (P) Ltd.,
A.C.17A, SIDCO Industrial Estate,
Thirumudivakkam,
Chennai 600 044.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R. Dhandapani v. Mr. Balaraman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Dhandapani v. Mr. Balaraman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Wahid Sharif Vs Minor W.Amina Faiza

M/S.Sree Dharasan Engineering Vs the State

K.Veddiyappan Vs M.Siva

R.Srinivasan,M/a 20 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

R.Srinivasan,M/a 20 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

Basha @ Manikandan, M/a 30 Y Vs the Executive Magistrate