S.K.Ramachandran v. Thiru.M.Rajasekar
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Contempt Petition, the petitioner challenged the respondent for non-compliance with a prior High Court direction. The respondent submitted proof that the direction was obeyed, and the Court closed the petition without adjudicating the petition for contempt.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt Petition was closed after the respondent established compliance with the prior direction.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.02.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Contempt Petition No.2147 of 2017
S.K.Ramachandran ..Petitioner Vs M.Rajasekar ..Respondent PRAYER :
Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent for the willful disobedience and for not implementing the direction with letter and spirit of the directions issued by this Court in WP.No.35053 of 2016 dated 22.03.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bharathy
For Respondents : Mr.L.P.Shanmuga Sundaram, Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
This contempt petition has been filed for the noncompliance of the order and direction issued by this Court in W.P.No.35053 of 2016 dated 22.03.2017.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to hold the respondent in contempt for non-compliance with a prior direction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.K.Ramachandran
- respondent
M.Rajasekar
Coram
D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court