The petitioner sought punishment for willful disobedience by the respondent to an order in W.P. No. 17025 of 2017. The court held that the order was complied with via a GO(Ms.) dated 08.06.2013. No further adjudication was deemed necessary, and the petition was closed without costs.
The contempt petition stands closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :18.01.2018
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.1915 of 2017 S.Shyamala ... Petitioner Vs. Thiru Niranjan Mardi, I.A.S., Principal Secretary to Government, Home (Tr.IV) Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai-9. ... Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein for willful disobedience to the orders of this Court passed in W.P.No.17025 of 2017 dated 05.07.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.Ravi Shanmugam
For Respondent : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made a submission that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.17025 of 2017 dated 05.07.2017, has been complied with, and the first respondent issued G.O.(Ms.)No.22 Home https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (Transport – IV) Department dated 08.01.2013 in this regard.
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order of the Court passed in W.P. No. 17025 of 2017 dated 05.07.2017 has been complied with.
Whether further adjudication is required in respect of the present contempt petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Shyamala
Thiru Niranjan Mardi
S. M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
