The petitioner sought punishment for contempt under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act regarding non-compliance with common orders. The petitioner submitted that the impugned orders were complied with. The High Court closed the petition on this submission.
Contempt Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.04.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Contempt Petition No.1765 of 2016
Kanimozhi ... Petitioner
versus
1. Tmt.S.Sivagami
The Block Development Officer,
Returning Officer / Commissioner,
Kandamangalam Panchayat Union,
Villupuram Taluk & District.
2. Tmt. M.Lakshmi, I.A.S.,
District Collector,
Office of District Collector,
Villupuram Taluk & District. ... Respondents
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for committing contempt of the common order dated 09.03.2016 made in C.M.P.No.867 of 2016 in C.R.P.No.165 of 2016 and the further common order dated 26.04.2016 made in C.M.P.No.867 of 2016 in C.R.P.No.165 of 2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanan
For Respondents : Mr.Mr.R.S.Selvam
Government Advocate
2
ORDER
Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that as the order has been complied with
by the respondents, nothing survives for adjudication in the contempt petition and hence, the same may be closed.
3
Dr.S.VIMALA, J.
ogy
Contempt Petition No.1765 of 2016
18.04.2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanimozhi
Tmt. S.Sivagami
Tmt. M.Lakshmi, I.A.S.
Dr. S.Vimala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
