M.Krishnan v. C.Subramanian
Case brief
What is this about?
The Maharashtra High Court closed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act after the petitioner submitted that the entire payment had been received.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed as submission that payment was received in full was accepted.
What the court decided
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 16.7.2018
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.1427 of 2017
M.Krishnan ...Petitioner
Vs
Mr.C.Subramanian, Managing
Director, M/s.Jayalakshmi Pressing
Pvt.Ltd., Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ...Respondent
PETITION under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts
Act for the act of contempt in disobeying the orders dated
29.2.2016 passed in MP.No.2 of 2015 in W.P.No.23159 of
2014.
For Petitioner : Ms.S.Girija
For Respondent : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the entire payment has been received by the petitioner.
- Recording the said submission, the above contempt petition is closed.
RS
SD/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) //Certified to be true copy//
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Krishnan
- respondent
Mr. C. Subramanian
Coram
T.S. Sivanthi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court