In a contempt petition regarding non-compliance of an order in a writ petition, the petitioner was absent. The court accepted the respondent advocate's representation that the court's orders were complied with and closed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 16.7.2018
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.1366 of 2018
M.Mani ...Petitioner
Vs
M.Parameswari, District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Collectorate, Sathuvachari, Vellore District. 632009.
...Respondent
PETITION under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.No. 10278 of 2016 dated 18.3.2016.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai, GA
ORDER
None appears for the petitioner.
learned Government Advocate that the order and direction issued by this Court have been complied with and that the respondent passed orders on 08.6.2018. But, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to verify and report. However, today, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent.
accepted and the above contempt petition is closed.
SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
rs
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
PS/19/11/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Mani
M.Parameswari
T.S.SIVAGNANAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
