S.Sabapathy v. Giri
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition was closed after respondents provided a verbal undertaking regarding land and building costs, allowing construction subject to litigation results.
What did the court decide?
Contours of contempt proceedings resolved via recorded undertaking; construction permitted subject to result of other litigation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.04.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Contempt Petition No.1287 of 2017
and Sub Application Nos.239 to 242 of 2017
S.Sabapathy ... Petitioner
versus
1. Giri
Inspector of Police,
E-3 Teynampet Police Station
Chennai.
2. S.Basheer Mohamed
3. B.Sheik Dawood ... Respondents
(R2 and R3 were impleaded as per
order dt.10.11.2017 in Cont.P.No.1287 of 2017)
Contempt Petition filed under Sections 10 and 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for his deliberate act of Contempt of Court by violating the interim order dated 23.02.2016 passed in C.R.P (NPD) No.165 of 2015.
For Petitioner : Mr.Murali Kumaran for M/s.MCGAN Law Firm
For R1 :
Mrs.A.Madhumathi, Government Advocate (CS) Mr.Richardson Suresh Kumar for Mr.B.Sundar
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Sabapathy
- respondent
Giri
- respondent
S. Basheer Mohamed
- respondent
B. Sheik Dawood
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court