Disposed

T. Sathish Kannan v. a. Dhanalakshmi

Madras HC13 Jul 2018CMP(MD)/1380/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court condoned a delay of 345 days in filing a civil miscellaneous appeal for enhancement of compensation. The court ordered the petitioner to pay Rs. 500 to the Chief Justice Relief Fund and agreed not to claim interest on the delayed period if the compensation is enhanced.

What did the court decide?

Delay condoned subject to payment of Rs. 500 to Chief Justice Relief Fund within one week.

T. Sathish Kannan Vs a. Dhanalakshmi — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Thirteenth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶6

CMP(MD) No.1380 of 2017 IN CMA(MD) No.SR4705 of 2017

¶7

T. SATHISH KANNAN ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

¶8

¶9

1 A. DHANALAKSHMI

¶10

2 THE BRANCH MANAGER M/S. SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO.42/30-30, H.A.K. ROAD, GROUND FLOOR, CHINNACHOCKKIKULAM, NEAR ICICI BANK,

¶11

MADURAI - 2. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 345 days in filing this appeal and thus render justice.

¶13

PRAYER IN CMA(MD) No.SR4705 of 2017:

¶14

to prefer this appeal before the Hon'ble Court for enhancement of compensation as against the Judgment and Decree in M.C.O.P.No.49 of 2014 on the file of Special Sub Judge for M.C.O.P. Cases, Madurai, dated 28.09.2015

¶15

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. K. KUMARAVEL, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.D.SIVARAMAN, Advocate for R2, the court made the following order:-

¶16

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 345 days in filing the above civil miscellaneous appeal in C.M.A.(MD) No.SR4705 of 2017.

¶17

When the matter came up for hearing today, the learned Counsel appearing for the 2^nd respondent would submit that the 2^nd respondent is not having any serious objections in condoning the delay, on condition that the petitioner/ appellant shall not claim interest for the delayed period in the event of enhancement by this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court, which is also agreed by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶18

¶19

In such a view of the matter, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered on condition that the petitioner shall pay a cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed automatically, without any further reference to this Court. However, the petitioner appellant shall not claim interest for the delayed period in the event of enhancement by this Court.

¶20

sd/13/07/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

¶23

THE SPECIAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE MADURAI

¶24

Copy to: THE SECTION OFFICER, ACCOUNTS SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶25

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.1380 of 2017 IN CMA(MD) No.SR4705 of 2017 Date :13/07/2018

¶26

SMA/CSL/SAR-1/19.07.2018:2P/3c

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T. Sathish Kannan v. a. Dhanalakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T. Sathish Kannan v. a. Dhanalakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Minor v.Vignesh Mani Vs P.S.Kesava Manohar

Tamilnadu State Transport Vs M.Balakrishnan

M. Seethai Vs the Secretary

The Managing Director Vs Anjali Devi

Lakshmi Vs M/S.Tamilnadu State Transport

M/S.Oriental Insurance Vs Rajasree,W/O.Kannayiram