S. Rama v. M. Manickavel
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought to vacate a prior stay order. The High Court heard arguments and dismissed the petition, upholding the existing stay.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Sixteenth day of February Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CMP No.4875 of 2017
in CRP.NPD.No.2807 of 2016
1 S. RAMA [ PETITIONERS ] BOTH PETITIONERS REP. BY POWER AGENT, DR.S.KAMALA, K.S SESHACHAR . F2, 30, ORMES ROAD, KILPAUK, CHENNAI-10.
2 K.S.KANNAN REP. BY POWER AGENT, DR.S.KAMALA, K.S. F2, 30, ORMES ROAD, KILPAUK, CHENNAI-10.
3 RANATHOMSON
4 CHELLIAH
Vs
1 M. MANICKAVEL [ RESPONDENTS ]
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to vacate the order of stay granted in CMP No. 14288 of 2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. RAMA
- petitioner
K.S.KANNAN
- petitioner
RANATHOMSON
- petitioner
CHELLIAH
- respondent
M. MANICKAVEL
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court