K.Nandakumar v. R.Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses without elaboration. The applicants moved to set aside an exparte order dated 02.07.2018. The court noted that the delay application had been allowed and the respondent had no objection. The petition was accordingly allowed.
What did the court decide?
Set aside the exparte order dated 02.07.2018 passed in C.S.No.657 of 2017.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
A.No.8545 of 2018 in
C.S.No.657 Of 2015
1.R.Ganesan S/o.Ramu Servai
2.G.Venkatesh S/o.R.Ganesan
both are residing at No.43/1D, Florentina Apartments Gandhi Nagar, Chennai 600 020.
3.G.Durga Devi W/o.S.Yashwanth residing at Door No.81/33 “Rams Apartments”,Flat No.1 Gandhi Nagar, 4th Main Road Adyar, Chennai -600 020.
... Plaintiffs/Respondents -Versus-
1.Mr.K.Nandakumar S/o.M.C.Kumaran No.5, Padmanabha Nagar Adyar, Chennai 600 020.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to set aside the exparte order dated 02.07.2018 passed in C.S.No.657 of 2017.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
R.Ganesan
- applicant
G.Venkatesh
- applicant
G.Durga Devi
- respondent
M/s Reliance Chits Pvt.Ltd
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court