S.Anandhan Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant sought permission to sell trust property. The High Court dismissed the application, holding it was too vague as it lacked purchaser details and property valuation.
What did the court decide?
The application is dismissed for the present and left open to be approached after identifying the buyer and providing a proper valuation.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
MONDAY, THE 26th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
A.No. 6525 of 2017 in C.S.No.5 of 1965
- V.M.Sundaram Chetty 2. N.Saravanan Chetty, & 3. V.S.Ratnasabapathy Chetty All are residing at No.28, Veeraswami Pillai Street, George Town, Madras
: Plaintiffs
Vs.
- V.N.Sambandam Chetty & 2. A.D.Loganatha Chetty Both residing at No.9, First Narayanan Street, Mint Buildings, Madras-1. : Defendants
A.No. 6525 of 2017:
S.Anandhan S/o. Late N.Saravana Chetty, No:24, Thirunavukarasu Street, Triplicane, Chennai.
: Applicant
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission to sell trust property can be granted without details of purchaser and valuation.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
S. Anandhan
Coram
R. Subramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court