Disposed

Hamsa v. Chinnakutty and 36 Others

Madras HC22 Feb 2018CS/301/1996

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a speaking order disposing of a civil suit for partition. The court recorded that the parties had reached a settlement via a Joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 12.01.2018. Consequently, the court passed a final decree in terms of the settlement.

What did the court decide?

Passing of a final decree in terms of the Joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 12.01.2018, which forms part of the decree. Parties to bear their own costs.

Hamsa Vs Chinnakutty and 36 Others — Partition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 22.02.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

C.S.No.301 of 1996
Mrs.Hamsa ... Plaintiff
..Vs..
1.Chinnakutty (deceased)
2.Neelakandan
3.Kalavathy
4.Minor Vanja
5.Minor Dhanasekar,
Minors rep. by their father/
natural guardian
Nallakandan
6.Andal
7.M.Kumar
8.M.Ravi
9.M.Mohan
10.Krishnan
11.Muniammal
12.Srinivasan
13.Poonagavanam
14.Komalam
15.Vasantha

¶7

http://www.judis.nic.in

16.Kulasekaran

17.Selvaraj

18.Murugesan

19.B.Chembakkavalli 20.Lalitha

¶13

21.Udayakumar

¶14

22.Mohana Krishn

¶15

23.Sankar 24.Thirumal

25.Arumugam

26.Kuppuswamy

27.Dharanipathy

28.Dhanakotti

29.Murugan

30.Saroja

31.Narayanaswamygar

32.Parvathiammal

33.Shanthi

34.S.Hemalatha

35.Indira

36.Kavitha

37.Raja ... Defendants

¶29

(Defendants 33 to 37 brought on record as LR's of the deceased Chinnakutty- the 1^st defendant as per the order dated 28.07.2008 in A.No.3397 of 2008

¶30

Plaint filed under Order XXIV Rules of High Court O.S. R/w Order

¶31

http://www.judis.nic.in VII R.1 of C.P.C. praying to pass a judgment and decree:-

¶32

¶33

a) For a preliminary decree for partition declaring the

¶34

plaintiff's 1/4^th share in the plaint F schedule properties.

¶35

b) For a final decree on the lines of preliminary decree by

¶36

dividing the plaint F schedule properties herein by metes and bounds by appointing an Advocate Commissioner and to allot the plaintiff her 1/4^th share therein and put her in possession of the same.

¶37

c) for costs of the suit and
d) for such other reliefs.
For Plaintiff : Mr.K.Govindan
For Defendants : Mr.P.B.Balaji for D1, 33 to 37
Mr.Ishtiaq Ahmed for D2 to D5
J U D G M E N T

¶38

At the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the parties,

¶39

the matter was referred to Mediation. The Mediation report has been filed stating that the parties have settled the matter between them as per the terms of Joint Memorandum of Compromise. The said Joint Memorandum of Compromise is also enclosed.

¶40

2.The learned counsel for the parties also affirmed that the

¶41

http://www.judis.nic.in matter is settled between the parties as per the terms of the Joint

¶42

¶43

Memorandum of Compromise. Hence, there will be a final decree in the

¶44

suit in terms of the Joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 12.01.2018. The Joint Memorandum of Compromise shall form part of the decree. Considering the nature of the suit parties are directed to

¶45

bear their costs.
22.02.2018
KP
Index : No
Internet : Yes
Speaking Order
To
The Sub Assistant Registrar,
Original Side,
High Court,
Madras.

¶46

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶47

¶48

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

¶49

¶50

C.S.No.301 of 1996
22.02.2018

¶51

http://www.judis.nic.in

Hamsa v. Chinnakutty and 36 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hamsa v. Chinnakutty and 36 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Bhanumathi Vs L.Suresh

Biostan Indian Pharmaceuticals Vs

M/s.Bohemian Destinations Pvt. Vs R.Balakumar

Wanbury Limited Vs M/S.Meena Health Care Pvt. Ltd.

Kasthuriraj Vs R.Kannan (Decd)

M/S.Color Chemicals Vs M/S.Match Point