10.The learned Additional Government Pleader would also submit that the language used in Section 153 of the Act would clearly envisage that only in case of either Registrar or the Government, as the case may be, being the Revisional Authority, to whom, it appears that any such decision or order which was sought to be revised, modified, annulled, reversed or remitted for reconsideration, then only, necessary order is to be passed by the Revisional Authority. Therefore, the Mandatory requirement under Section 153 of the Act is that only in case of requirements of modification, annulment, reversion or remitted back for reconsideration, such decision has to be made by the revisional authority, after giving an opportunity of making representation by the revision petitioner, against whom, order, prejudiced in nature is to be passed. Here, in the case in hand, since the petitioner did not file or did not appear before the Revisional Authority either to modify or annul or reverse or even to remit the matter for re-consideration and therefore, a short order has been issued by the Revisional Authority, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that merely because a short order has been passed by the Revisional Authority, the same has to be construed as an order passed under nonapplication of mind and without considering the merits of the issue. Therefore, the learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that the impugned order is justifiable and needs no interference from this Court.
