Writ petitions filed to quash a demand notice were dismissed for non-prosecution as no party appearance or representation was forthcoming on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 27.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P(MD)Nos.4511 to 4513 of 2015 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 + 1 + 1 of 2015
M/S.Sangeeth Textiles Ltd., 551, Ganesapuram Post, Annur - 641107, Coimbatore. Represented by its Director ... Petitioner in WP(MD) No.4511 of 2015
M/S.Shri Mookambiga Spinning Mills Ltd., 551, Ganesapuram Post, Annur - 641107, Coimbatore. Represented by its Director ... Petitioner in WP(MD) No.4512 of 2015
M/S.Sri Vasudeva Textiles Ltd., 551, Ganesapuram Post, Annur - 641107, Coimbatore. Represented by its Director ... Petitioner in WP(MD) No.4513 of 2015
Vs.
Common Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 2nd respondent culminating in Notice No. dated 19.03.2015 and quash the same. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2
In all writ petitions For Petitioner ... No appearance For R1 & R2 ... Mr.M.Alagathevan Special Government Pleader
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions have been filed, seeking to quash the Impugned Demand Notice dated 19.03.2015, issued by the 2nd respondent.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-I) /True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
RM/AR
TE/MR-KKR/SAR-II : 04/08/2017 : 2P/4C
W.P(MD)Nos.4511 to 4513 of 2015 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 + 1 + 1 of 2015 27.07.2017
M/S. Sangeeth Textiles Ltd.
M/S. Shri Mookambiga Spinning Mills Ltd.
M/S. Sri Vasudeva Textiles Ltd.
The District Collector, Theni
The President, Sankarapuram Panchayat
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
