Petitioner sought mandate to remove encroachment by 6th respondent on common pathway. Court allowed petition in part and directed 4th respondent to examine prior representation and dispose within one month.
Writ petition allowed in part; 4th respondent directed to look into representation dated 07.02.2017 and dispose within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.03.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.2458 of 2017
G.Gopalsamy .. Petitioner
Vs.
6.S.Pandiyammal .. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents from 1 to 4 to remove the encroachment made by the sixth respondent in the common pathway in S.No.153(8/9) in Nallamanayakkanpatti Village, Appanayakkanpatti Post, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District within the time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan For Respondents : Mr.K.Guru, 1,2 and 4 Additional Government Pleader. For Respondents 3 and 5 : Mr.S.Sadeeshkumar, Additional Government Pleader. For Respondent No.6 : No appearance https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to remove encroachments which are in existence in S.No.153(8/9) in Nallamanayakkanpatti Village, Appanayakkanpatti Post, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has contended to the effect that the petitioner has given a representation on 07.02.2017 with regard to alleged encroachments which are in existence in Survey No.153(8/9), but the same has not been considered by the respondents 1 to 5 and therefore the present writ petition has been filed for getting the relief sought therein.
3.Considering the nature of the relief sought in the writ petition, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.
4.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the fourth respondent is directed to look into the representation dated 07.02.2017 alleged to have been given by the petitioner and dispose of the same within a period of one month.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (AD-II)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
PSM/SV-MMS/13.04.2017/2P/8C
ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.2458 of 2017 23.03.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petition for removal of encroachments can be allowed in part directing a specific respondent to look into a representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Gopalsamy
District Collector cum-Inspector of Panchayat, Virudhunagar
Sub-Collector, Sivakasi
Block Development Officer, Sattur
Tahsildar, Sattur
Special Officer, Nallamanayakkanpatti Village Panchayat
A.SELVAM
N.AUTHINATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
