Partly allowed

D.S.Selvam, v. the District Collector

Madras HC21 Mar 2017WP(MD)/2214/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed a writ petition under Article 226 directing the respondents to consider and dispose of representations filed by the petitioner concerning the non-allotment of patta on government poromboke land within one month, without costs.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to look into representations dated 26.10.2014 and 05.12.2016 and dispose of the same within one month.

D.S.Selvam, Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 21.03.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.2214 of 2017

¶7

D.S.Selvam .. Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The District Collector, Madurai District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

¶10

The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. .. Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to issue house site patta to any of the private individuals in respect of the Government poromboke land in Survey Nos.223 and 224 situated in Kinnimangalam Village, Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District by considering the representations of the petitioner dated 26.10.2014 and 05.12.2016.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sathish Babu For Respondents : Mr.K.Guru, Additional Government Pleader.

¶13

ORDER

¶14

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J. ]

¶15

This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents not to issue patta to private individuals in respect of Survey Nos.223 and 224, Kinnimangalam Village, Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.

¶16

2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the respondents has contended to the effect that Survey Nos.223 and 224 are classified as Government poromboke land and so far

¶17

¶18

nobody has been granted patta.

¶19

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has contended that on 26.10.2014 and 05.12.2016, representations have been given, but the same have not been considered.

¶20

4.Considering the aforesaid factual circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.

¶21

5.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the respondents are directed to look into the representations dated 26.10.2014 and 05.12.2016 and dispose of the same within a period of one month.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar (RTI)

¶24

/True Copy/

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

¶27

The District Collector, Madurai District.

¶28

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

¶29

The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District.

¶30

1 CC TO Mr.N.SATHISH BABU, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 16595

¶31

SMN

¶32

TE/SKN-RSK/SAR-II : 27/03/2017 : 2P/5C

¶33

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.2214 of 2017 21.03.2017

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.S.Selvam, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.S.Selvam, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asaithambi Vs the Inspector of Police

Alagupandi Vs the District Collector

Nainar Mohammed Vs the Special Officer / B.Do

K.Rajan Vs the District Collector

T.Rajarathinam Vs the Commissioner

V.Ariraj Pillai, Vs the Superintendent of Police