V. Chandru v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner acknowledged that the relief sought regarding the Maha Kumbhabhishekham was no longer sought.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.05.2017 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
W.P.(MD).No.19238 of 2015 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015
V.Chandru
..Petitioner
Vs. 1. The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.
- The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
- The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
- The Executive Officer/Thakkar Banapuriswarar temple, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Kumbakonam Thanjavur District. ...Respondents
PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents or their subordinates from conducting Maha Kumbhabhishekham in Banapuriswarar temple situated at Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Chandru
- respondent
The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department
- respondent
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department
- respondent
The Executive Officer/Thakkar Banapuriswarar temple
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court