Dismissed

P. Thangam, v. the District Collector

Madras HC26 Jul 2017WP(MD)/17669/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged orders transferring Panchayat maintenance duties and executive powers to new officers via a writ petition. The court found the posts of President were no longer in existence. It held no further order was required, dismissing the petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

P. Thangam, Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 26.07.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.17669 of 2015 and

¶7

M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015

¶8

P.Thangam ... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

¶12

G.Gurubakiyam ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent made in Na.Ka.U.E.1/4291/2012 dated 09.07.2015 and its consequential order in Na.Ka.U.E.1/4291/2012 dated 14.09.2015 and quash the same.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha

¶15

For Respondent No.1 : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah Government Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mrs.S.Bharathi For Respondent No.3 : M/s.AL.Ganthimathi

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

This writ petition has been filed, questioning the impugned orders of the first respondent passed in Na.Ka.U.E.1/4291/2012 dated 09.07.2015 and Na.Ka.U.E.1/4291/2012 dated 14.09.2015, vide which, the charge of maintenance of bank accounts of the Panchayat has been transferred to the second respondent and the executive powers of the petitioner, being the President of Nallamayakanpatti https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Village Panchayat, has been transferred to the third respondent.

¶18

¶19

2.It is common knowledge that the posts of President, Vice President, etc., are no more in existence and therefore, this Court is of the view that no further order is required in this petition. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infrucuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(crl side)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶26

The Block Development Officer,

¶27

Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

¶28

+1cc to M/s. AL.Ganthimathi, Advocate Sr.No.68001

¶29

+1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.68639

¶30

SMN

¶31

VB/MR/KKR/SAR3/07/08/2017/2P/5C

¶32

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.17669 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 26.07.2017

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P. Thangam, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Thangam, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gnanamirtham, Vs the District Collector

Ramalakshmi Vs the Commissioner

Mrs. Vijayalakshmi Vs the Inspector of

Madurai Central Market Tomato Vs the Commissioner

A. Karuppiah Vs the District Collector

N. Rajathi Vs the District Collector